National Core Indicators Project
In January 1997, the National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities
Services (NASDDDS) and the Human Services Research Institute launched the Core Indicators
Project. The name of the data collection collaborative was changed to National Core
Indicators (NCI) in 2002. The aim of the initiative is to develop nationally recognized
performance and outcome indicators that will enable developmental disabilities policy
makers to benchmark the performance of their state against the performance of other states.
National Core Indicators also enables each participating state developmental disabilities
agency to track system performance and outcomes from year to year on a consistent basis.
The NCI Steering Committee, composed of participating state coordinators, determines the
overall direction of the initiative. The timeline below summarizes the development of NCI.
Phase I (1998-1999)
The initial phase of the project, which included seven field test states, encompassed three main activities:
- Reaching agreement concerning the areas of system performance that merited attention
and were susceptible to data collection across multiple jurisdictions. The result was the
selection of 61 "candidate indicators" organized by areas of common concern that the
participating states identified.
- Development of data collection protocols including a Consumer Survey and a Family Survey,
which assesses the perceptions of families with an adult family member living at home.
- Field-testing data collection tools, assessing the utility and validity of the
various measures, and determining future activities.
Phase II (1999-2000)
In September 1998, the NASDDDS Board of Directors reaffirmed its commitment to, and
continued sponsorship of the NCI. Phase II encompassed 11 states. The second phase
of NCI drew on the lessons learned during Phase I and entailed a refinement in the
Core Indicators and the addition of another data collection tool - the Family/Guardian
Survey, which assesses the perceptions of families and guardians who have an adult
family member receiving residential supports out of the home.
Phase III (2000-2001)
Phase III of the project included 15 states - Arizona, Connecticut, Delaware, Iowa,
Kentucky, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, North Carolina, Pennsylvania,
Utah, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington. During this Phase some states employed
the new Children/Family Survey to assess the experiences and outcomes for families
with family members who are under age 21.
Phase IV (2001-2002)
In its fourth year, CIP had 22 fully participating states plus one state in which
a county was participating independently of the state (Regional Center of Orange
County, California). Several important changes took place in Phase IV:
- Two "cycles" of data collection were established. Data submitted prior to
February 28, 2002 (first cycle) were analyzed and summarized in a preliminary
report in June 2002. Remaining data were submitted prior to June 30, 2002 (second
cycle). Data from both cycles were analyzed together and included in the final reports.
- Four subcommittees were established to involve states in the continual improvement
of indicators and data collection tools. Each subcommittee is led by NCI staff and
composed of volunteers from participating states.
- At the Steering Committee meeting in August 2002, members voted to rename the
initiative "National Core Indicators" (NCI).
Phase V (2002-2003)
Two new states joined NCI in Phase V, South Carolina and South Dakota.
Phase VI (2003-2004)
Phase VII (2004-2005)
In Phase VII, the District of Columbia joined the NCI effort. The data collection and
reporting schedule was changed back to a one cycle, with all data due in at the end of
June. Final reports will be published one per year, in the fall.
Phase VIII (2005-2006)
Three new states joined NCI in Phase VIII, Arkansas, Georgia, and Texas. In addition,
three Regional Centers from the Bay Area of California joined as a pilot group. The
state of South Dakota, which had been on hiatus for two years, re-established participation
in the national effort. For additional information regarding the National Core Indicators: